Economus v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Economus
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco and City of San Francisco Police Officer
Case Number: 3:2018cv01071
Filed: February 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 202 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 82 Motion to Retain Confidentiality. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2019)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES 197 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS COSTS. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2019)
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 178 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of City and County of San Francisco, Flint Paul against Anthony Economus. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2019)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 156 Stipulation Dismissing Plaintiff's Cause of Action for Battery Against All Defendants. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2019)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER re 59 MOTION to Compel: Defendants shall produce the Whitted Report to Plaintiff by no later than April 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/28/2019. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 39 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL.Motions due by 4/3/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 138 Administrative Motion to Bring Daubert Motions and More than Five Motions In Limine. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2019)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 121 Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 52 Stipulation Resetting Dispositive Motion Schedule. Dispositive Motion due by 1/31/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2018)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend Fact and Expert Discovery Deadlines.Close of Fact Discovery due by 1/7/2019, Opening Reports due by 1/20/2019, Rebuttal Reports due by 2/8/2019 and Close of Expert Discovery due by 2/22/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 35 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 11/2/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2018)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 40 Stipulation to Reset Date by Which Defendants Must File Their Responsive Pleadings and to Continue the Deadline for Early Neutral Evaluation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 29 Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 8/11/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018)
July 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018)
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granting 22 Stipulation SETTING CASE SCHEDULE. Discovery due by 11/30/2018; Designation of Experts due by 12/14/2018; Designation of Rebuttal Experts due by 1/4/2019; Close of Expert Discovery due by 1/18/2019; Dispositive Motion due by 1/22/2019; Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2019 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (7-day) set for 4/22/2019 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Economus v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Economus
Represented By: Patrick Matthew Buelna
Represented By: John L. Burris
Represented By: Adante Pointer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco
Represented By: Brian Paul Ceballo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Francisco Police Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?