Joe v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Curtis T. Joe |
| Ford Motor Company, Nicholas K. Corporation dba The Ford Store San Leandro and Nicholas K. Corporation a California Corporation doing business as The Ford Store San Leandro |
| 3:2018cv01491 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -5) TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by MDL Panel on 3/28/2018; new case no. 2:18-cv-02594 (tlhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2018) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs and Defendant Ford Motor Company shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/9/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2018) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company Of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding (Attachments: #1 Exhibit MDL ORDER, #2 Exhibit CTO 1, #3 Exhibit CTO 2)(Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 3/13/2018) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2018) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Anastasia Bondarchuk (Bondarchuk, Anastasia) (Filed on 3/9/2018) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Pollard Vilchez (Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 3/9/2018) |
| Answer to Removed Complaint (see Document #1 -6) filed by Ford Motor Company. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/22/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF STATE COURT from Alameda. Their case number is RG18891874. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12170573). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Demand for Jury Trial, #4 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit ADR Packet, #6 Exhibit Ford's Answer, #7 Exhibit Dealership Answer, #8 Declaration Declaration of Spencer P. Hugret, #9 Declaration Declaration of Katherine P. Vilchez, #10 Exhibit Declaration of Katherine P. Vilchez, #11 Exhibit Declaration of Katherine P. Vilchez, #12 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Affidavit Certificate of Interested Parties)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 3/8/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
