Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. CARIBOU ENERGY CORPORATION et al
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Russell E. Burns, James E. Murray, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Operating Engineers And Participating Employers Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice And Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Vacation, Holiday and Sick Pay Trust Fund, Heavy and Highway Committee and Operating Engineers Local 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO |
CARIBOU ENERGY CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER SCOTT YENZER and RAFAEL PADILLA |
3:2018cv02086 |
April 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re: 22-3663-DMR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/1/2022. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Filing 17 WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $535,144.35 as to Caribou Energy Corporation, Rafael Padilla, Innerline Engineering Inc. (original mailed to Matthew P. Minser) (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) Modified on 10/5/2018 (cpS, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.