Petersen v. City of Oakley et al
| Michael Petersen |
| City of Oakley and Chris Thorsen |
| 3:2018cv02448 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 12/5/2019)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. The attached order grants the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismisses claims three through six without prejudice and with leave to amend. The plaintiff must file any amended complaint by J uly 23, 2018. The court asks the plaintiff to consider whether he really wants to amend his complaint given that the Fourth Amendment claims cover the gravamen of his alleged harm. If he does, then the court asks the defendants to consider whether th ey might reserve their arguments on any Fourteenth Amendment claims for summary judgment. The discovery is the same, and perhaps everyone's interests are advanced by moving the case into the case-management phase. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 7/7/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
