Apel v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Greg Apel
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company and Pfizer, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv03781
Filed: June 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. LoPalo (LoPalo, Christopher) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE The filing of the judgment dated April 8, 2020 in any case that was previously dismissed is a function of the courts automated systems and is not intended to have any effect on such prior dismissal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OFDEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/8/2020. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
June 29, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Inc. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2018)
June 26, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2018)
June 25, 2018 Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-12462950.). Filed by Greg Apel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Liakos, Jennifer) (Filed on 6/25/2018) Modified on 6/29/2018 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apel v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greg Apel
Represented By: Jennifer R. Liakos
Represented By: Melissa Anne Agnetti
Represented By: Christopher R. LoPalo
Represented By: Hunter J. Shkolnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?