Cashmarq Global Consultants, Inc., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
| Cashmarq Global Consultants, Inc. |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service |
| 3:2018cv04069 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H Orrick |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7426 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| #Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Cashmarq Global Consultants, Inc. Defendant Party Enter ed Incorrectly. Parties should not be entered in all Capitalized Lettering. Case Title Entered Incorrectly. The Civil Cover Sheet and the Complaint Should not be Entered as a One Part Entry but as Separate Parts. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REFUND OF FUNDS ERRONEOUSLY LEVIED FOR A THIRD PARTY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; against Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service ; (NO PROCESS); ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12492676.). Filed byCashmarq Global Consultants, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Complaint)(Housh, Christopher) (Filed on 7/6/2018) Modified on 7/9/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
