Arkoussian v. Cohen et al
Plaintiff: Joe Arkoussian
Defendant: Lean Meals, Inc., Ivan Cohen and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv04092
Filed: July 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Phyllis J Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 81
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United Parcel Service, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (McPherson, Mark) (Filed on 7/9/2018)
July 9, 2018 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate United Parcel Service Co., Other Affiliate United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio corporation) for United Parcel Service, Inc.. (McPherson, Mark) (Filed on 7/9/2018)
July 9, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/23/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2018)
July 9, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV326100. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12495895). Filed byUnited Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McPherson, Mark) (Filed on 7/9/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arkoussian v. Cohen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Arkoussian
Represented By: Daniel G. Herns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lean Meals, Inc.
Represented By: Gary Alan Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ivan Cohen
Represented By: Gary Alan Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Represented By: Mark David McPherson
Represented By: Niles Ammon Pierson
Represented By: Paul T. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?