Steward v. County of Santa Clara et al
| Aaron Steward |
| Tony Alvarez, Christopher Graham, County of Santa Clara, Richard Guerzo, Rico West, Adam Valle and Amy Le |
| 5:2018cv04119 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/10/2022)
|
|
Filing
135
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
|
|
Filing
122
FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/2/2020)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING -- DUE BY 3PM ON FEBRUARY 28, 2020 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/25/2020)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRTIVE MOTION TO SEAL denying 57 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/28/2020)
|
|
Filing
30
PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/9/18. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
