Wong v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Paul Wong
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security
Case Number: 3:2018cv04328
Filed: July 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D Laporte
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2018 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner Social Security.. (Branick-Abilla, Margaret) (Filed on 8/25/2018)
August 21, 2018 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Wong. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice served on 8/21/2018, answer due 11/21/2018. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2018)
August 21, 2018 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Wong. Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office Served on 07/23/18; Answer Due 10/23/18; (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2018)
August 21, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Wong. Commissioner Social Security served on 7/23/2018, answer due 10/23/2018. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2018)
July 27, 2018 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Paul Wong.. (Kim, Paul) (Filed on 7/27/2018)
July 20, 2018 Filing 9 RECEIPT OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT from the U.S. Marshal Service Regarding Service on SSA Office of the General Counsel Region IX; Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office; Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice. Re #7 Order (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2018)
July 20, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security: SSA Office of the General Counsel Region IX; Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office; Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2018)
July 20, 2018 Sent USM 285 Packet to the U.S. Marshal Service placed in their Post Box in the Clerk's Office Mailroom; Re #8 Summons Issuance (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2018)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Re Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #2 Application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk issue summons, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the #1 complaint, any amendments, #5 scheduling orders, attachments, plaintiff's #2 affidavit and this order upon the defendant(s). (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2018) Modified on 7/20/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
July 18, 2018 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2018. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018)
July 17, 2018 Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. Signed by The Executive Committee on 7/17/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)
July 17, 2018 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Paul Wong . (Kim, Paul) (Filed on 7/17/2018)
July 17, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/31/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)
July 17, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Paul Wong. (Kim, Paul) (Filed on 7/17/2018)
July 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISION OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT CASE); (NO PROCESS); (IFP PENDING); against Commissioner Social Security. Filed byPaul Wong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kim, Paul) (Filed on 7/17/2018) Modified on 7/18/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
July 17, 2018 #Electronic filing error. Please docket the current version of the court's civil cover sheet available on our website. Thank you. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Paul Wong (s rnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wong v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security
Represented By: Margaret Branick-Abilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Wong
Represented By: Paul Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?