Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund et al v. Three Rivers Flooring, Inc.
Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund and Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund |
THREE RIVERS FLOORING, INC., a California Corporation, QUALITY CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation, Quality Contracting Services, Inc and Three Rivers Flooring, Inc. |
3:2018cv04480 |
July 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
William H Orrick |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund (McDonough, Katherine) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (McDonough, Katherine) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (McDonough, Katherine) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quality Contracting Services, Inc.,Three Rivers Flooring, Inc., ; ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12539384.). Filed by Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonough, Katherine) (Filed on 7/24/2018) Modified on 9/19/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.