Chatman v. Chase Bank et al
| Eric C. Chatman |
| Bank of America, Chase Bank, BBB Bank, Union Bank and Wells Fargo |
| 3:2018cv04560 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Monterey |
| PSLC AGB |
| James Donato |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric C. Chatman. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/14/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/14/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/14/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
|
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS filed byEric C. Chatman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2018) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Eric C. Chatman. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric C. Chatman. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BBB Bank, Bank of America, Chase Bank, Union Bank, Wells Fargo (Filing fee $ 400-ifpp). Filed byEric C. Chatman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
