Sandbergen v. ACE American Insurance Co. et al
Mark Sandbergen |
ACE American Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies and ACE American Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies |
3:2018cv04567 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Sandbergen. Federal Insurance Co. served on 8/24/2018, answer due 9/14/2018. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 9/14/2018) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Sandbergen. ACE American Insurance Co. served on 8/24/2018, answer due 9/14/2018. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 9/14/2018) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mark Sandbergen.. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 8/6/2018) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Defendant Federal Insurance Co.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendant ACE American Insurance Co.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement du e by 10/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/10/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT for Damages, Restitution and Injunctive Relief: (1)Violation of Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 207; (2)Violation of Cal. Labor Code Sections 510, 1194 and 1198, and IWC Wage Order(s); (3)Failure to Provide and/or Authorize Meal and Rest Periods (Cal. Labor Code Sections 512, 226.7, and IWC Wage Order(s); (4)Failure to Timely Pay All Wages Due in Violation of California Labor Code Section 203; and (5)Violation of Cal. Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et seq. against ACE American Insurance Co. & Federal Insurance Co., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-12549051). Filed by Mark Sandbergen. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018) Modified on 8/2/2018 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.