Sandbergen v. ACE American Insurance Co. et al
Plaintiff: Mark Sandbergen
Defendant: ACE American Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies and ACE American Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Case Number: 3:2018cv04567
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Sandbergen. Federal Insurance Co. served on 8/24/2018, answer due 9/14/2018. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
September 14, 2018 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Sandbergen. ACE American Insurance Co. served on 8/24/2018, answer due 9/14/2018. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
August 6, 2018 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mark Sandbergen.. (Starr, Logan) (Filed on 8/6/2018)
August 2, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Defendant Federal Insurance Co.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
August 2, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendant ACE American Insurance Co.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
August 2, 2018 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement du e by 10/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
July 27, 2018 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/10/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT for Damages, Restitution and Injunctive Relief: (1)Violation of Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 207; (2)Violation of Cal. Labor Code Sections 510, 1194 and 1198, and IWC Wage Order(s); (3)Failure to Provide and/or Authorize Meal and Rest Periods (Cal. Labor Code Sections 512, 226.7, and IWC Wage Order(s); (4)Failure to Timely Pay All Wages Due in Violation of California Labor Code Section 203; and (5)Violation of Cal. Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et seq. against ACE American Insurance Co. & Federal Insurance Co., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-12549051). Filed by Mark Sandbergen. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/27/2018) Modified on 8/2/2018 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandbergen v. ACE American Insurance Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Sandbergen
Represented By: Bryan Jeffrey Schwartz
Represented By: Logan McMillan Starr
Represented By: Eduard R Meleshinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACE American Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACE American Insurance Co. doing business as Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?