Hanes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Kelley Hanes
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2018cv04607
Filed: July 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Referring Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint byHartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
August 23, 2018 Filing 12 STIPULATION of the Parties to Extend Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) (Filed on 8/23/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelley Hanes. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company served on 8/3/2018, answer due 8/24/2018. (Coen, Rachel) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 2, 2018 Filing 10 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/6/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
August 1, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2018)
August 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/1/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2018)
August 1, 2018 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/25/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/1/2018 10:00 AM. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kelley Hanes.. (Coen, Rachel) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/14/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Kelley Hanes (Coen, Rachel) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Coen, Rachel) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
July 31, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12555503.). Filed byKelley Hanes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coen, Rachel) (Filed on 7/31/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelley Hanes
Represented By: Rachel S. Coen
Represented By: Claire Kennedy-Wilkins
Represented By: Cassie Springer Ayeni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Sean Patrick Nalty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?