Cutlip v. Chiang
Plaintiff: Chikako Cutlip
Defendant: Charlie Chiang
Case Number: 3:2018cv04711
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: William H Orrick
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal
Cause of Action: 28:0157
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2018 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE : Regarding Motion Withdrawal of the Reference. Re #1 Motion (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018)
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference ; filed by Chikako Cutlip. Responses due by 8/20/2018. Replies due by 8/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Docket Report, #2 Notice of Transmission)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cutlip v. Chiang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlie Chiang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chikako Cutlip
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?