Rojo v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Zoraida F. Rojo
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Nicholas K Corporation and Nicholas K Corporation a California Corporation doing business as Ford Store San Leandro
Case Number: 3:2018cv04775
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2018 Filing 14 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14) by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, MDL No. 2814. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018)
August 31, 2018 case electronically transmitted to the Central District of California. their new case number is 2:18-cv-07537, filed 8/29/2018. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018) Modified on 9/6/2018 (tnS, COURT STAFF).
August 15, 2018 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/5/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/14/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 14, 2018 Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Jon S. Tigar. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
August 14, 2018 Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint [1-7] by Ford Motor Company. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING Initial Case Management Conference for 8/29/2018 10:00 AM in before Magistrate Judge Cousins in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. Case Management Statement due 8/22/2018. All parties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/22/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Plaintiff to respond to Ex Parte Application For An Order Staying All Proceedings #4 by 8/15/2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/22/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 First Ex Parte Application For An Order Staying All Proceedings And Deadlines Pending JPML Determination Of Inclusion In Multidistrict Litigation (MDL No. 2814 filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly Jeannette Mrowka (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Mrowka, Molly) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/8/2018)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior. Their case number is 18-CV-330082. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12577381). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Declaration, #10 Declaration, #11 Exhibit A, #12 Declaration, #13 Certification of Interested Entities Or Persons, #14 Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 8/8/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rojo v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Molly Jeannette Mrowka
Represented By: Anastasia Bondarchuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas K Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas K Corporation a California Corporation doing business as Ford Store San Leandro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zoraida F. Rojo
Represented By: Amy-Lyn Morse
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?