The Center for Investigative Reporting, et al., v. United States Department of Justice
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR), The Center for Investigative Reporting and Aaron Sankin |
Department of Justice and United States Department of Justice |
3:2018cv04852 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Elizabeth D Laporte |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint ; by United States Department of Justice. (Saltiel, Steven) (Filed on 9/18/2018) Modified on 9/19/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: The parties are hereby notified that the Case Management Conference is rescheduled to 11/6/2018 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Case Management Statement is now due by 10/30/2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2018) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aaron Sankin, The Center for Investigative Reporting (Baranetsky, Diana) (Filed on 8/21/2018) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The Center for Investigative Reporting.. (Baranetsky, Diana) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States Department of Justice. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/6/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2018 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 8/10/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
#Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) Plaintif f Party Sankin was not entered. Plaintiff & Defendant Parties Entered Incorrectly. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) (Baranetsky, Diana) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Baranetsky, Diana) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; against Department of Justice ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12585746.). Filed by The Center for Investigative Reporting, et al., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Exhibit Ex. B, #3 Exhibit Ex. C, #4 Exhibit Ex. D, #5 Exhibit Ex. E, #6 Exhibit Ex. F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baranetsky, Diana) (Filed on 8/10/2018) Modified on 8/13/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.