Atari Interactive, Inc. v. SunFrog, LLC
Plaintiff: Atari Interactive, Inc.
Defendant: SunFrog, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv04949
Filed: August 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Filing 21 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Atari Interactive, Inc.. (Wang, Ivy) (Filed on 10/9/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 20 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
August 30, 2018 Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 10/9/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/17/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)
August 29, 2018 Filing 18 Case Reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Judge Jeffrey S. White no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018)
August 29, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: John Di Giacomo, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-12636377) filed by SunFrog, LLC. (Di Giacomo, John) (Filed on 8/29/2018) Modified on 8/29/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RELATED CASE ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting (22) Motion to Relate Case in case 3:18-cv-03451-JST. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018)
August 22, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Ranallo (Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 8/22/2018)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/20/18. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2018 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Judge Executive Committee on 8/17/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (djmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Atari Interactive, Inc... (Wang, Ivy) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivy A. Wang (Wang, Ivy) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 16, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to SunFrog, LLC. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2018)
August 16, 2018 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/6/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2018 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2018)
August 16, 2018 Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/30/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith Joseph Wesley of Ivy A. Wang (Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Atari Interactive, Inc. (Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
August 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting [15 U.S.C. Section]; Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq.]; Trademark Dilutions [16 U.S.C. Section 1125(c)]; False Designation of Origin [15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a)]; Common Law Unfair Competition; Contributory Trademark Infringement; Contributory Copyright Infringement; Vicarious Trademark Infringement; Vicarious Copyright Infringement; Demand for Jury Trial against SunFrog, LLC, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-12596811). Filed by Atari Interactive, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit 1-3, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Wesley, Keith) (Filed on 8/15/2018) STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atari Interactive, Inc. v. SunFrog, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atari Interactive, Inc.
Represented By: Keith Joseph Wesley
Represented By: Ivy A. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SunFrog, LLC
Represented By: Nicholas Ranallo
Represented By: John Di Giacomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?