Phelps et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Tracy S Phelps and Kent R Phelps
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 4:2018cv05050
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2018. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 11/29/2018 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 9/10/18. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2018)
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/10/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2018)
September 7, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 6, 2018 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kent R Phelps, Tracy S Phelps.. (Housh, Christopher) (Filed on 9/6/2018)
September 5, 2018 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/19/2018. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2018)
August 23, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kent R Phelps, Tracy S Phelps re #6 Summons Issued as to USA (Housh, Christopher) (Filed on 8/23/2018)
August 21, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2018)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 *** DISREGARD, FILED IN ERROR*** Summons Issued as to United States of America. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018) Modified on 8/21/2018 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2018 01:30 PM. Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2018. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/4/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Housh, Christopher) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Refund of Overpayment of Taxes against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12605221.). Filed byKent R Phelps, Tracy S Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A through F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Housh, Christopher) (Filed on 8/17/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phelps et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy S Phelps
Represented By: Christopher Patrick Housh
Represented By: Joseph Michael Bray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kent R Phelps
Represented By: Christopher Patrick Housh
Represented By: Joseph Michael Bray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?