Chen v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Plaintiff: Xiaoping Chen
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Case Number: 4:2018cv05064
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 635
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/4/18. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2018 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2018)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Executive Committee on 9/4/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2018)
August 31, 2018 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018)
August 30, 2018 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Xiaoping Chen.. (Lilienstein, David) (Filed on 8/30/2018)
August 30, 2018 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.. (Kang, Clarissa) (Filed on 8/30/2018)
August 23, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, Notice of Assignment of Case, Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge, Standing Orders for Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, Consenting to the Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Kang, Clarissa) (Filed on 8/23/2018)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2018 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #1 Notice of Removal, Filing Procedures, ECF Registration Information and Standing Orders of the Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James (Kang, Clarissa) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/31/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Answer to Removed Complaint (see document no. #1 ; page 37) filed by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF STATE COURT ACTION PURSUANT TO 12 U.S.C. 632 from San Francisco Superior. Their case number is San Francisco Superior. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12606453). Filed byFederal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Kang, Clarissa) (Filed on 8/17/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xiaoping Chen
Represented By: David M. Lilienstein
Represented By: Katie Joy Spielman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Represented By: Clarissa A. Kang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?