Penny v. Santa Rita County Jail
| Louis Levern Penny |
| Santa Rita County Jail |
| 3:2018cv05327 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC CET |
| Edward M Chen |
| Robert M Illman |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REQUEST for certified/endorsed copies filed by Louis Levern Penny. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2018) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Assistance of Counsel filed by Louis Levern Penny. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2018) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/26/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2018)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2018) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Louis Levern Penny.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Motion and Motion for Hearing filed by Louis Levern Penny. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Louis Levern Penny. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) |
| Filing 4 Erroneous Entry--Please Ignore--See Below For Correct Document CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 10/9/2018. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) Modified on 8/30/2018 (msrS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff regarding Instructions to Claim Lawsuit Packet. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Plaintiff regarding Claim Lawsuit Packet. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Santa Rita County Jail. Filed byLouis Levern Penny. Consent/Declination due by 9/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Envelope)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Penny v. Santa Rita County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Louis Levern Penny | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Santa Rita County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
