Bunting v. Berryhill
| Suzan Lynn Bunting |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 4:2018cv05402 |
| September 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case Nancy A. Berryhill served on 10/3/2018, answer due 1/2/2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Modi, Asim) (Filed on 10/11/2018) Modified on 10/12/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT FOR SERVICE Executed as to #7 Summons Issued as to USA Acknowledgement filed by Suzan Lynn Bunting. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 USM-285, #3 USM-285)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2018)
|
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2018) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/18/2018. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2018) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Linden, David) (Filed on 9/3/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Suzan Lynn Bunting. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Linden, David) (Filed on 9/3/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. Filed bySuzan Lynn Bunting. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Linden, David) (Filed on 9/3/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bunting v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Suzan Lynn Bunting | |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Linden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Asim H. Modi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
