Crandall v. Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc. et al
| Craig Crandall |
| Janet S. Rodriguez, Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc., Robert J. Rodriguez and Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc. doing business as Baechtel Creek Inn |
| 3:2018cv05569 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint byBaechtel Creek Inn, Inc., Janet S. Rodriguez, Robert J. Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Neary, Christopher) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Craig Crandall re 6 Clerk's Notice, (Best, Zachary) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Crandall. Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc. served on 10/28/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. (Best, Zachary) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Crandall. Robert J. Rodriguez served on 10/28/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. (Best, Zachary) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Crandall. Janet S. Rodriguez served on 10/17/2018, answer due 11/7/2018. (Best, Zachary) (Filed on 10/22/2018) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/28/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 3/21/2019. Please refer to Judge Chen's standing orders on the Court's web page at: www.cand.uscourts.gov/emcorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc., Janet S. Rodriguez, Robert J. Rodriguez. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Best, Zachary) (Filed on 9/11/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) against Baechtel Creek Inn, Inc., Janet S. Rodriguez, Robert J. Rodriguez (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12669739.). Filed by Craig Crandall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Best, Zachary) (Filed on 9/11/2018) Modified on 9/13/2018 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
