3Q Digital, Inc. v. Blackbird PPC, LLC et al
Plaintiff: 3Q Digital, Inc.
Defendant: Jay Stampfl, Jack Stampfl and Blackbird PPC, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv05684
Filed: September 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D Laporte
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2018 Filing 14 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, to extend time to respond to complaint filed by Blackbird PPC, LLC, Jack Stampfl, Jay Stampfl. (Martinez-Garcia, Carlos) (Filed on 11/1/2018)
November 1, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Carlos Ivan Martinez-Garcia (Martinez-Garcia, Carlos) (Filed on 11/1/2018)
October 31, 2018 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by 3Q Digital, Inc... (Pitt, Keith) (Filed on 10/31/2018)
October 22, 2018 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/5/2018. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2018) Modified on 10/22/2018 (shyS, COURT STAFF).
October 22, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/5/2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2018)
October 5, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Jay Stampfl. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018)
October 5, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Jack Stampfl. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018)
October 5, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Blackbird PPC, LLC. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018)
October 4, 2018 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Pitt, Keith) (Filed on 10/4/2018)
October 4, 2018 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Pitt, Keith) (Filed on 10/4/2018)
October 4, 2018 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Pitt, Keith) (Filed on 10/4/2018)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2018 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/17/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/1/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT; (MISAPPROPRATION OF TRADE SECRETS; BREACH OF CONTRACT; BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; INTERNATIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT); DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; (NO PROCESS); i> against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12685740.). Filed by3Q Digital, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pitt, Keith) (Filed on 9/17/2018) Modified on 9/18/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 3Q Digital, Inc. v. Blackbird PPC, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Stampfl
Represented By: Carlos Ivan Martinez-Garcia
Represented By: Robert A. Cutbirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Stampfl
Represented By: Carlos Ivan Martinez-Garcia
Represented By: Robert A. Cutbirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blackbird PPC, LLC
Represented By: Carlos Ivan Martinez-Garcia
Represented By: Robert A. Cutbirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 3Q Digital, Inc.
Represented By: Keith Pitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?