Penny-Baten v. Social Security
| Ann Penny-Baten |
| Commissioner Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2018cv05701 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case by Ann Penny-Baten. Commissioner Social Security served on 10/10/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner Social Security.. (Illarmo, Marcelo) (Filed on 10/10/2018) |
| Filing 9 Acknowledgment of Receipt re #7 Summons Issued. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 8 Sent USM 285 Packet to the U.S. Marshal Service placed in their Post Box in the Clerk's Office Mailroom; Re #7 Summons Issuance (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2018) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security: SSA Office of the General Counsel Region IX; Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office; Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2018) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall issue summons. Furthermore, the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the #1 complaint, any amendments or attachments, Plaintiff's #2 affidavit and this order upon Defendant(s); (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2018) Modified on 9/20/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: Signed by the Executive Committee on 9/18/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Ann Penny-Baten Revised. (Kim, Paul) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ann Penny-Baten. (Kim, Paul) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISION OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; (ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT) (NO PROCESS); (IFP PENDING); ( against Commissioner Social Security. Filed byAnn Penny-Baten. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kim, Paul) (Filed on 9/18/2018) Modified on 9/20/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect Revision of Civil Cover Sheet used. Current Revision is JS 44 (Rev. 06/17) [err101]. Please e-file an Amended Civil Cover Sheet only. Event is located at: Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Ann Penny-Baten (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
