Ryan v. Wang
| Wade Samuel Ryan |
| Shengyang Wang |
| 3:2018cv05708 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPLY to Defendant's Opposition (re #6 MOTION to Remand ) filed by Wade Samuel Ryan. (Morris, Curtis) (Filed on 10/17/2018) Modified on 10/17/2018 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 15 Declaration of John W. Ranucci in Support of #14 Opposition/Response to Motion to Remand filed byShengyang Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #14 ) (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #6 MOTION to Remand ) filed byShengyang Wang. (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
| Filing 13 Declaration of John W. Ranucci in Support of #12 Amended Document (Amended Notice of Removal) filed byShengyang Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) #12 ) (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 10/9/2018) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED DOCUMENT: Amended Notice of Removal by Shengyang Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Ranucci, John) (Filed on 10/9/2018) Modified on 10/12/2018 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Shengyang Wang.. (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 9/28/2018) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/12/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2018) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Wade Samuel Ryan.. (Morris, Curtis) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Order re #6 MOTION to Remand by Wade Samuel Ryan. (Morris, Curtis) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 7 Declaration of Curtis J. Morris in Support of #6 MOTION to Remand filed byWade Samuel Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Related document(s) #6 ) (Morris, Curtis) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand filed by Wade Samuel Ryan. Motion Hearing set for 11/29/2018 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Responses due by 10/11/2018. Replies due by 10/18/2018. (Morris, Curtis) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Shengyang Wang (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/13/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2018 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/18/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018)
|
| Answer to #1 Removal Complaint (Part 5 Page 2); byShengyang Wang. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/2/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of John W. Ranucci in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byShengyang Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Ranucci, John) (Filed on 9/18/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CASE TO FEDERAL COURT; (NO PROCESS); from Sonoma County Superior Court. Their case number is SCV261494. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12688645). Filed byShengyang Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ranucci, John) (Filed on 9/18/2018) Modified on 9/19/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ryan v. Wang | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shengyang Wang | |
| Represented By: | John W. Ranucci |
| Represented By: | Sheena Patel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wade Samuel Ryan | |
| Represented By: | Curtis Jackson Morris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
