Staggs et al v. Facebook, Inc.
| Shelly Forman, Mitch Staggs and Sandra Atkins |
| Facebook, Inc. |
| Scott Schinder |
| 3:2018cv05754 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
Filing 7
ORDER RELATING CASES: 18-md-02843-VC, In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation; 18-cv-05714-LB, Akins v. Facebook, Inc.; 18-cv-05752-DMR, Kmieciak v. Facebook, Inc.; 18-cv-05754-EDL, Staggs v. Facebook, Inc.; 18-cv-05770-VC, Miller v. Facebook, Inc.; and 18-cv-05811-JSC, McDonnell v. Facebook Inc.. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 10/3/2018. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2018)
|
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #6 MOTION to Relate Case filed by Scott Schinder The Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related Should be e-filed into the Lower Case (ONLY) which is Case Number 18-md-2843 VC. In the future if the case is not the lower case than a Notice of Related Case should be e-filed (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 6 SEE ERROR MESSAGE DATED 09/21/18 MOTION to Relate Case filed by Scott Schinder. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lesley E. Weaver, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Weaver, Lesley) (Filed on 9/20/2018) Modified on 9/21/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Facebook, Inc. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2018) |
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2018 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/19/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/3/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Vlahakis, James) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; against Facebook, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12694184.). Filed byMitch Staggs, Shelly Forman, Sandra Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vlahakis, James) (Filed on 9/19/2018) Modified on 9/20/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
