Shah v. Chegg, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Bhupendra V. Shah
Defendant: Chegg, Inc. and Daniel Rosensweig
Case Number: 3:2018cv05956
Filed: September 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Chegg, Inc., Daniel Rosensweig. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
September 28, 2018 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER SEC CLASS ACTION This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras SEC Class Action Notice due by 10/18/2018. Case Management Statement due by 12/28/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2019 08:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2018)
September 28, 2018 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Counsel by Robert Vincent Prongay on behalf of Bhupendra V. Shah (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Bhupendra V. Shah (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 1 CLASS ACTOPM COMPLAINT against Chegg, Inc., Daniel Rosensweig ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12718935.). Filed byBhupendra V. Shah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 9/27/2018) Modified on 9/28/2018 (mclS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shah v. Chegg, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chegg, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Rosensweig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bhupendra V. Shah
Represented By: Robert Vincent Prongay
Represented By: Lionel Z. Glancy
Represented By: Charles Henry Linehan
Represented By: Lesley F. Portnoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?