Clark v. The Hershey Company
Howard Clark, Todd Hall and Angela Pirrone |
The Hershey Company |
3:2018cv06113 |
October 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William Alsup |
Kandis A Westmore |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER DENYING #14 MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018) |
Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against The Hershey Company. Filed by Howard Clark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 11/21/2018) Modified on 11/23/2018 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 15 Request for Judicial Notice re #14 MOTION to Dismiss filed byThe Hershey Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16)(Related document(s) #14 ) (Borden, Matthew) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by The Hershey Company. Motion Hearing set for 12/20/2018 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 11/27/2018. Replies due by 12/4/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew Borden, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Proposed Order)(Borden, Matthew) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint filed by The Hershey Company. (Borden, Matthew) (Filed on 10/23/2018) |
Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Hershey Company (Borden, Matthew) (Filed on 10/23/2018) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Howard Clark. The Hershey Company served on 10/9/2016, answer due 10/30/2016. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 10/16/2018) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UPON REASSIGNMENT - Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/3/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2019 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before the Honorable William Alsup. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders.. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
Filing 9 NOTICE AND ORDER RE PUTATIVE CLASS ACTIONS AND FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/10/2018. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2018) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to The Hershey Company. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) |
Filing 4 DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Howard Clark.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 10/4/2018) Modified on 10/5/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/18/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 10/4/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against The Hershey Company ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12737476.). Filed by Howard Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 10/4/2018) Modified on 10/5/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.