Nido et al v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
Reinier Catapang, Celes Nido, Aristides Amano, Hung Vo, John Nguyen and Roberto de los Reyes |
4G Project People, Inc. and Ericsson, Inc. |
3:2018cv06194 |
October 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Joseph C Spero |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Aristides Amano, Reinier Catapang, John Nguyen, Celes Nido, Roberto de los Reyes, Hung Vo.. (Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 11/1/2018) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 11/15/2018. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Ericsson, Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2018) |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 1/4/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/11/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2018) |
Filing 6 Refund Status re #5 Application for Refund DECLINED. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2018) |
Filing 5 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-12751038 by Aristides Amano, Reinier Catapang, John Nguyen, Celes Nido, Roberto de los Reyes, Hung Vo. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/24/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 10/10/2018) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Aristides Amano, Reinier Catapang, John Nguyen, Celes Nido, Roberto de los Reyes, Hung Vo . (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 10/10/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-12751071.). Filed by John Nguyen, Celes Nido, Reinier Catapang, Aristides Amano, Hung Vo, Roberto de los Reyes. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 10/10/2018) Modified on 10/15/2018 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.