Sparacino et al v. FCA US LLC
| Donna Sparacino and Ryan Sparacino |
| FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and FCA US LLC, |
| 4:2018cv06388 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #4 MOTION to Remand ) filed byFCA US LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Complaint)(Bokmuller, Tammara) (Filed on 11/30/2018) |
| Filing 12 Renotice motion hearing re #4 MOTION to Remand filed byDonna Sparacino, Ryan Sparacino. (Related document(s) #4 ) (Basola, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/30/2018) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Remand . Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2019 02:00 PM before Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2018) Modified on 11/30/2018 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/29/18. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/17/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/24/2019 03:00 PM. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/27/18. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2018)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Donna Sparacino, Ryan Sparacino.. (Basola, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/26/2018) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by FCA US LLC,.. (Bokmuller, Tammara) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/23/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: The parties are hereby notified that the hearing on the motion for remand is rescheduled to 1/15/2019 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand filed by Donna Sparacino, Ryan Sparacino. Motion Hearing set for 1/15/2019 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Responses due by 11/30/2018. Replies due by 12/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Basola, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/16/2018) |
|
Filing 3
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2019 03:00 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/19/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/2/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018) |
| #Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Defendant Party Entered Incorrectly. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2018) |
| Answer to #1 Removal Complaint (Page 28); byFCA US LLC,. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1331 (FEDERAL QUESTION); DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; (NO PROCESS); from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is C18-01643. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12775430). Filed byFCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested Parties)(Bokmuller, Tammara) (Filed on 10/18/2018) Modified on 10/19/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
