Raheem v. Top Grade Construction Goodfellow
Olatunji Raheem |
Top Grade Construction | Goodfellow |
3:2018cv06397 |
October 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Maxine M Chesney |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. If plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, such pleading shall be filed no later than December 10, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 19, 2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/19/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mllS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 Filing fee: $ 100.00, receipt number 34611137904. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Plaintiff shall make partial payment of the filing fee in the amount of $100 no later than November 21, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 31, 2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/1/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2019 10:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, #2 Standing Order, #3 All Judges Standing Order)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE re new case number in this Court. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 2:18-cv-02761. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/18/2018 TRANSFERRING this matter to the USDC for the Northern District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, Case Transferred Out to Another District served on Olatunji Raheem. (Yin, K) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Olatunji Raheem. (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Olatunji Raheem. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Top Grade Construction | Goodfellow by Olatunji Raheem.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Raheem v. Top Grade Construction Goodfellow | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Top Grade Construction | Goodfellow | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Olatunji Raheem | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.