The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation v. Shmavonian
| The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation |
| Gerald Shmavonian |
| 3:2018cv06564 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Trademark Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 copy of Complaint)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2018) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Gerald Shmavonian. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 1/18/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/25/2019 10:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2018) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2018) |
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation re #1 Complaint, (Humphreys, Scott) (Filed on 10/26/2018) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation re #1 Complaint, (Humphreys, Scott) (Filed on 10/26/2018) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Humphreys, Scott) (Filed on 10/26/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement against Gerald Shmavonian ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12798680.). Filed byThe Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Humphreys, Scott) (Filed on 10/26/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation v. Shmavonian | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation | |
| Represented By: | Scott S. Humphreys |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gerald Shmavonian | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
