Foster v. A-Para Transit Corp.
| Darryl Foster |
| A-Para Transit Corp. |
| 3:2018cv06576 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| James Donato |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. § 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY (re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint ) filed byA-Para Transit Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 12/27/2018) |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint ) filed byDarryl Foster. (Attachments: #1 Proof Of Service)(Roberts, Tony) (Filed on 12/20/2018) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by A-Para Transit Corp.. Motion Hearing set for 1/10/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 12/20/2018. Replies due by 12/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Gina Kumar, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 12/6/2018) |
| Filing 19 REPLY (re #15 MOTION to Remand Case Back To State Court ) filed byDarryl Foster. (Attachments: #1 Proof Of Service)(Roberts, Tony) (Filed on 11/30/2018) |
Filing 18
ORDER VACATING HEARING. The Court finds the motion to remand, Dkt. No. #15 , to be suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The hearing that was set for December 13, 2018 is vacated, and the Court will issue a decision on the papers. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/26/2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
|
| Filing 17 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 MOTION to Remand Case Back To State Court ) filed byA-Para Transit Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gina Kumar)(Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Remand Case Back To State Court filed by Darryl Foster. Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2018 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 11/23/2018. Replies due by 11/30/2018. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service)(Roberts, Tony) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Tony Roberts (Attachments: #1 Proof Of Service)(Roberts, Tony) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2019. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/8/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge James Donato. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/7/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Darryl Foster.. (Attachments: #1 Proof Of Service)(Shipman, Alexandra) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/20/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. ( (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Compliant filed by A-Para Transit Corp.. Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2018 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Responses due by 11/19/2018. Replies due by 11/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Gina Kumar, #2 Proposed Order)(Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 11/5/2018) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by A-Para Transit Corp... (Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 11/5/2018) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by A-Para Transit Corp. re #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, and Brochure "Consenting to a Magistrate Judge's Jurisdiction in the Northen District of California" (Forsey, Morgan) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 1/ 24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/31/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2018) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by A-Para Transit Corp. re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Removal to Fed. Court., and the assigned judge's standing orders (Forsey, Morgan) (Filed on 10/29/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/13/2018. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2018) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by A-Para Transit Corp. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 10/29/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is RG18920985. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12800888). Filed byA-Para Transit Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Gina Kumar in Support of Notice of Removal, #3 Defendant A-Para Transit Corp.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Beckwith, Amanda) (Filed on 10/29/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
