Wiley et al v. Health Services Media, Inc. et al
| Stephanie Shortridge, Washeeta Wiley and Steve Foster |
| Brandon Blum, Health Services Media, Inc. and Health Services Media, Inc. doing business as Maid Complete |
| 3:2018cv06680 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Initial Case Management Order, Standing Orders, Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge, Accompanying Documents served on Health Services Media, Inc. dba Maid Complete on 11/16/18, filed by Steve Foster, Stephanie Shortridge, Washeeta Wiley. (Hicks, Ryan) (Filed on 12/12/2018) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Initial Case Management Order, Standing Orders, Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge, Accompanying Documents served on Brandon Blum on 11/16/2018, filed by Steve Foster, Stephanie Shortridge, Washeeta Wiley. (Hicks, Ryan) (Filed on 12/12/2018) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Steve Foster, Stephanie Shortridge, Washeeta Wiley.. (Hicks, Ryan) (Filed on 11/16/2018) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendants Brandon Blum & Health Services Media, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Hicks, Ryan) (Filed on 11/7/2018) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/4/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/11/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/16/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2018) |
| Filing 1 CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION: COMPLAINT for Violations of: (1) Fair Labor Standards Act; (2) California Labor Code; (3) California Unfair Competition Law; (4) Private Attorney General Act; Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-12817657). Filed by Steve Foster, Washeeta Wiley & Stephanie Shortridge. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Summons)(Hicks, Ryan) (Filed on 11/2/2018) Modified on 11/7/2018 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
