Herrera v. Hatton
Petitioner: Joshua S. Herrera
Respondent: Foss and Shawn Hatton
Case Number: 3:2018cv06757
Filed: November 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Referring Judge: Lucy H Koh
2 Judge: PSLC RMH
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition as Second or Successive filed by Shawn Hatton. Responses due by 2/25/2019. Replies due by 3/11/2019. (Thayer, Jill) (Filed on 1/28/2019)
December 4, 2018 *** Copy of #1 Petition, #7 Order, and mailed to Respondent and CA State Attorney General*** (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2018)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; STAYING RULING ON MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING by Judge Vince Chhabria. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 11/28/2018 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Lucy H. Koh no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(iymS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018)
November 7, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joshua S. Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
November 7, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing filed by Joshua S. Herrera. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
November 7, 2018 Filing 2 Declaration of Joshua Herrera filed by Joshua S. Herrera. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
November 7, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed by Joshua S. Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herrera v. Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua S. Herrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Foss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shawn Hatton
Represented By: Jill Marietta Thayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?