McDaniel v. United States et al
| Tanya Grace McDaniel |
| Yolo County, City of Davis, City of Sacramento, State of California, United States of America and City of San Francisco |
| 4:2018cv06785 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Adopting #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/19/18. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2018)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RELATING CASE TO 4:18-cv-04618 JSW. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/26/18. Parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge (JSW) immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 1915 Review of Complaint. Objections due by 11/30/2018. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 16, 2018. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 SUA SPONTE REFERRAL TO DETERMINE RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. This referral has also been filed in Case No. 18-cv-4618 JSW. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 16, 2018. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2018: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Fraudulent; Jury Trial Demanded against City of Davis, City of Sacramento, City of San Francisco, State of California, United States of America, Yolo County (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel. Consent/Declination due by 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
