Arroyo, Jr. v. Conway et al
Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
John Conway and Menlo Service, Inc. |
3:2018cv06853 |
November 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Joseph C Spero |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING re #10 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants John Conway and filed by Menlo Service, Inc., John Conway to Respond t Complaint.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/8/19. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 1/18/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2019) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS JOHN CONWAY AND MENLO SERVICE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by John Conway, Menlo Service, Inc.. (Simonson, John) (Filed on 1/4/2019) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. Menlo Service, Inc. served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 12/21/2018) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. John Conway served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 12/21/2018) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to John Conway, Menlo Service, Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rafael Arroyo, Jr... (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Carson, Chris) (Filed on 11/19/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/27/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Rafael Arroyo, Jr. re #1 Complaint, (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief for Violations of: Americans With Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act against John Conway, Menlo Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-12840366.). Filed by Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carson, Chris) (Filed on 11/13/2018) Modified on 11/20/2018 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.