Shandel v. Progressive Casualty Insurance et al
| Nicholas Shandel |
| Progressive Casualty Insurance and Progressive Express Insurance Company |
| 3:2018cv06873 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Nicholas Shandel as to Answer to Counterclaim (Riddle, Edwin) (Filed on 12/17/2018) Modified on 12/18/2018 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM re #8 Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim filed by Nicholas Shandel. (Riddle, Edwin) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Nicholas Shandel byProgressive Express Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Progressive Express Insurance Company re #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, #1 Notice of Removal, #6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 5 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/15/2018) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2019 10:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2018) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Progressive Express Insurance Company.. (Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Progressive Express Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Progressive Commercial Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Progressive Express Insurance Company . (Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lake County Superior Court. Their case number is 418702. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12844586). Filed by Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Howe, Patrick) (Filed on 11/14/2018) Modified on 11/15/2018 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
