Griffin v. Parrent Smith Investigations et al
| John Griffin |
| DOES 1-10, inclusive, Parrent Smith Investigations, Joanne Parrent and Nichols J. Smith |
| 3:2018cv07092 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to the Central District of California. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #9 Stipulation To Transfer Case To The United States District Court Of The Central District Of California. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by John Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation To Transfer Case To The United States District Court Of The Central District Of California)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 1/16/2019) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Joanne Parrent, Parrent Smith Investigations, Nichols J. Smith.. (Redfield, Charles) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Joanne Parrent, Parrent Smith Investigations, Nichols J. Smith. Motion Hearing set for 2/14/2019 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Responses due by 1/22/2019. Replies due by 1/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order)(Redfield, Charles) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Griffin.. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 12/10/2018) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Joanne Parrent, Parrent Smith Investigations, Nichols J. Smith. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/5/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Parrent Smith Investigations, Nichols J. Smith, Joanne Parrent (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12866684). Filed by John Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/21/2018) Modified on 11/28/2018 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
