Yasin v. Nielsen et al
| Nargis Yasin |
| John Neufeld, John Kramar, Tracy Renaud, Matthew Whitaker, Kirstjen Nielsen, Christopher A. Wray and L. Francis Cissna |
| 3:2018cv07115 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed copy of #10 Order to USCIS, Attention : San Francisco Field Office Director, 630 Sansome Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 10
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #9 Stipulation To Remand Naturalization Cause of Action and Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File a Response. The court remands Cause of Action A to USCIS but retains jurisdiction over the matter to ensure that the plaintiff's naturalization application is resolved by 4/25/2019 and, if not, may continue to hear the plaintiff's petition for hearing on her application. The court extends the defendants' time to respond to Cause of Action B until 4/25/2019. If the plaintiff does not file a motion for summary judgment by 5/24/2019, the defendants must file their motion for summary judgment by 6/24/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2019)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation To Remand Naturalization Cause Of Action And Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File A Response filed by L. Francis Cissna, John Kramar, John Neufeld, Kirstjen Nielsen, Tracy Renaud, Matthew Whitaker, Christopher A. Wray. (Winslow, Sara) (Filed on 1/10/2019) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by L. Francis Cissna, John Kramar, John Neufeld, Kirstjen Nielsen, Tracy Renaud, Matthew Whitaker, Christopher A. Wray.. (Winslow, Sara) (Filed on 1/10/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nargis Yasin.. (Lieberman, Ruby) (Filed on 12/6/2018) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kirstjen Nielsen, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2018) |
| Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2018) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nargis Yasin (Lieberman, Ruby) (Filed on 11/23/2018) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Lieberman, Ruby) (Filed on 11/23/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/7/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12868220.). Filed byNargis Yasin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration declaration for exhibits, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lieberman, Ruby) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
