Daniels v. Berryhill
Victor Lee Daniels |
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill |
3:2018cv07326 |
December 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill.. (Lahey, Sharon) (Filed on 1/15/2019) |
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Victor Lee Daniels.. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/31/2018) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case Nancy A. Berryhill served on 12/20/2018, answer due 3/20/2019. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2018) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/2/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2018) |
Filing 9 Acknowledgment of Receipt received from the USMS re summons. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Filing 8 Sent USM 285 Packet to the U.S. Marshal Service placed in their Clerk's Office Mail Box. Re #7 Summons Issued. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2018) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill: SSA Office of the General Counsel Region IX; Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office; Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2018) |
Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Directs the Clerk of the Court to issue summons. The court also directs the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California to serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the #1 complaint, any amendments or attachments, the plaintiff's #3 affidavit, and this order upon the defendant(s). (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2018) Modified on 12/6/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/18/2018. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Victor Lee Daniels. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Review of The Final Decision Of The Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed byVictor Lee Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.