Collins v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Lashonda T. Collins
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv07642
Filed: December 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2019)
January 3, 2019 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2019)
January 3, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Lashonda T. Collins. Service waived by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC waiver sent on 12/26/2018, answer due 2/25/2019. (Volheim, Nathan) (Filed on 1/3/2019)
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #3 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Nathan Volheim. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2019)
January 3, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lashonda T. Collins.. (Volheim, Nathan) (Filed on 1/3/2019)
December 20, 2018 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/3/2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2018)
December 19, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12943081.) filed by Lashonda T. Collins. (Volheim, Nathan) (Filed on 12/19/2018)
December 19, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 12/19/2018)
December 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12943051.). Filed byLashonda T. Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wajda, Nicholas) (Filed on 12/19/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lashonda T. Collins
Represented By: Nathan Charles Volheim
Represented By: Nicholas Michal Wajda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?