In the Matter of James Paul Baratta - #292848
James Paul Baratta |
3:2018mc80206 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
James Donato |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER OF SUSPENSION re #1 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/7/19. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
Filing 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 1/3/2019.. Signed by Judge Donato on 11/21/18. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2018: #1 USPS cert mail receipt) (fabS, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2018: #2 usps) (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In the Matter of James Paul Baratta - #292848 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: James Paul Baratta | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.