Oliver v. Lyft Inc. et al
| Anthony Oliver |
| Kristin Sverchek, Lyft Inc., Logan Green and John Zimmer |
| 3:2019cv00270 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE by Anthony Oliver Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Entire Action to be Refiled in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/9/2019) |
| Filing 24 ERRATA re #23 MOTION to Stay by Anthony Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Motion to Stay)(Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/8/2019) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Stay filed by Anthony Oliver. Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 3/22/2019. Replies due by 3/29/2019. (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/8/2019) |
Filing 22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/8/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2019)
|
| Filing 21 Declaration of Anthony Oliver in Support of #19 Proposed Summons, #20 Proposed Summons, #12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #18 Proposed Summons filed byAnthony Oliver. (Related document(s) #19 , #20 , #12 , #18 ) (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/6/2019) |
| Filing 20 Proposed Summons. (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
| Filing 19 Proposed Summons. (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
| Filing 18 Proposed Summons. (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief for Violations of Antitrust laws against Logan Green, Lyft Inc., Kristin Sverchek, John Zimmer. Filed byAnthony Oliver. (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 3/5/2019) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Parties or counsel may appear personally at 10:00 a.m. or file a request to appear by telephone at 11:00 am. If any party files such a request to appear by telephone, the Case Management Conference shall be moved to 11:00 am to be held telephonically. All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at 866/582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference. Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 15 Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Judge William Alsup no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER RELATING CASES 18-cv-07166 RS and 19-00270 WHA. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/27/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2019)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Lyft Inc. [Defendant Lyft Inc.'s Notice of Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related Pursuant to Local Rule 3-12(b)] (Friedrichs, Kerry) (Filed on 2/20/2019) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS AND SERVICE WILL BE DETERMINED SEPARATELY. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2019)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Anthony Oliver (Oliver, Anthony) (Filed on 1/30/2019) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2019)
|
| Filing 9 returned as undeliverable re #5 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, #4 Notice (Other), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2019) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Anthony Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2019) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2019 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Anthony Oliver.. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties by Anthony Oliver (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Anthony Oliver in Support of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed byAnthony Oliver. (Related document(s) #2 ) (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Logan Green, Lyft Inc., Kristin Sverchek, John Zimmer. Filed byAnthony Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
