Secure Cam, LLC v. Vivotek USA, Inc.
Secure Cam, LLC |
Vivotek USA, Inc. |
3:2019cv00302 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Susan Illston |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2019 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 01, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order, #3 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 12 ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Susan Illston. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/8/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2019) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Secure Cam, LLC.. (Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 2/7/2019) |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Secure Cam, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Invention Investment Fund I LP, Other Affiliate Invention Investment Fund II LLC, Other Affiliate Red Dragon Innovations, LLC, Other Affiliate Intellectual Ventures 49, LLC, Other Affiliate Intellectual Ventures 48, LLC, Other Affiliate Brandt Law Firm, Other Affiliate 2s Ventures, LLC, Other Affiliate ALY Ventures, LLC, Other Affiliate Close Brokerage, LLC, Other Affiliate Nicholas Ranallo for Secure Cam, LLC. (Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 2/7/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/19/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Vivotek USA, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 complaint)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2019 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/31/2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 1/17/2019) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding (cc: form mailed to register). (Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 1/17/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vivotek USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13013335.). Filed bySecure Cam, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ranallo, Nicholas) (Filed on 1/17/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Secure Cam, LLC v. Vivotek USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Secure Cam, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Ranallo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vivotek USA, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.