Hernandez v. Yumi Yogurt I et al
Gerardo Hernandez |
J. Robert Lehmann, Yumi Yogurt I and Ruth Lehmann |
3:2019cv00639 |
February 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Gerardo Hernandez re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #11 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION From Service Deadline re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - ADA Case, #1 Complaint, Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 4/4/2019) |
Filing 11 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION From Service Deadline re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - ADA Case, #1 Complaint, Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) filed by Gerardo Hernandez. Responses due by 4/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tanya E. Moore, #2 Exhibit A-E)(Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 4/4/2019) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant J. Robert Lehmann ONLY by Gerardo Hernandez (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 4/4/2019) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION re #8 Summons Returned Executed filed by Gerardo Hernandez. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 4/1/2019) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerardo Hernandez. Yumi Yogurt I served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/15/2019) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gerardo Hernandez.. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 2/26/2019) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/11/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2019) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to J. Robert Lehmann, Ruth Lehmann, Yumi Yogurt I. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/20/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13068587.). Filed byGerardo Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.