Bartholomew v. Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Bartholomew
Defendant: Flowserve Corporation and Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan
Case Number: 3:2019cv00829
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Tamara Irene Devitt (Devitt, Tamara) (Filed on 4/8/2019)
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #9 Stipulation Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/6/2019. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 6/13/2019 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2019)
April 4, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/18/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
April 4, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Costello, Matthew) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
March 29, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jeffrey Bartholomew. Service waived by Jeffrey Bartholomew waiver sent on 2/15/2019, answer due 4/16/2019. (Reilly, William) (Filed on 3/29/2019)
March 29, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jeffrey Bartholomew . (Reilly, William) (Filed on 3/29/2019) Modified on 3/29/2019 (ahm, COURT STAFF).
March 29, 2019 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #7 Notice (Other) filed by Jeffrey Bartholomew ( ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2019)
March 6, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 3/20/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019)
February 19, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019)
February 19, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/9/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/16/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019)
February 15, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/1/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2019)
February 15, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kalkin, Scott) (Filed on 2/15/2019)
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan, Flowserve Corporation (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13096644). Filed by Jeffrey Bartholomew. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kalkin, Scott) (Filed on 2/15/2019) Modified on 2/19/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartholomew v. Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowserve Corporation
Represented By: Tamara Irene Devitt
Represented By: Matthew E Costello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan
Represented By: Tamara Irene Devitt
Represented By: Matthew E Costello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Bartholomew
Represented By: Scott D. Kalkin, Esq.
Represented By: William B Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?