Medina v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
Plaintiff: Fernando Medina
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington Inc
Case Number: 3:2019cv00950
Filed: February 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fernando Medina. Expeditors International of Washington Inc served on 3/1/2019, answer due 3/22/2019. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019)
March 25, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Expeditors International of Washington Inc re #5 Answer to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Service by Mail)(Lee, Theodora) (Filed on 3/25/2019)
March 21, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/4/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019)
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint byExpeditors International of Washington Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Service by Mail)(Lee, Theodora) (Filed on 3/21/2019)
February 26, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fernando Medina. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2019)
February 21, 2019 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/16/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/23/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to r eview General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019)
February 21, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Expeditors International of Washington Inc. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019)
February 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Expeditors International of Washington Inc (Filing fee $400; Receipt No.34611140542). Filed by Fernando Medina. Consent/Declination due by 3/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington Inc
Represented By: Yesenia Garcia Perez
Represented By: Theodora Rochelle Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?