Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc.
| Supercell Oy |
| GREE, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv01106 |
| February 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/14/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Supercell Oy identifying Corporate Parent Tencent Holdings Ltd. for Supercell Oy. (Sacksteder, Michael) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Sacksteder, Michael) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Supercell Oy. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Geoffrey Miller ISO Application to File Under Seal, #2 Proposed Order Granting Application to File Under Seal, #3 Redacted Version of Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Regarding Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity; Breach of Contract, #4 Unredacted Version of Complaint, #5 Unredacted Version of Exhibit A, #6 Unredacted Version of Exhibit B, #7 Unredacted Version of Exhibit O)(Miller, Geoffrey) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment Re Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity; Breach of Contract against GREE, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13129888.). Filed bySupercell Oy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Filed Under Seal), #2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O (Filed Under Seal), #16 Exhibit P, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sacksteder, Michael) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Supercell Oy | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey Robert Miller |
| Represented By: | Michael John Sacksteder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GREE, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
