Richards v. Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation et al
| Larry Richards |
| California Medi-Cal, Call Operator Debbi, Call Supervisor Mariah and Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation |
| 3:2019cv01136 |
| February 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1915 Review. The case is to be reassigned to a district judge immediately in light of the pending TRO Motion. Objections due by 3/14/2019. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on February 28, 2019. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Richards. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Larry Richards. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) Modified on 2/28/2019 (amgS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
